Restaurant Passio

I personally think it is the number one restaurant in Helsinki🍴 The service is very good, and the dishes are introduced one by one (I don’t understand what they are saying)🤷🏻‍♀️ The most important thing is the taste, which is very Nordic and very good~ [Cover face][Cover face][Cover face] ​

In this restaurant it was nice, not too much noise and still feel some privacy. The interior design was nice, relaxing and not too fancy. We ordered the five course set menu. Especially the starter, the kitchen greeting and the dessert were all good. We are not even big fans of desserts but in this place we ate it to the last crumb and the coffee was really tasteful.

A restaurant with a very unique design. You can't order food. The dishes are fixed every two weeks. It depends on luck what you can eat. The overall standard is very high, the waiters are very enthusiastic, and they will explain the characteristics of the ingredients and cooking methods for each dish.

This should be the most expensive meal of this time, costing 128 euros for two people. Passio, ranked first in Helsinki, recommended by Michelin. There is no menu here, everything depends on the chef's mood. Ordered Riesling sparkling wine, dishes were Iberian black pork, salmon, and dessert was mango sorbet. The black pork was the best, the salmon was average, and the sorbet was too sour [tears]

There are three-course and five-course set menus to choose from. There is also a pre-starter before the appetizer and a pre-dessert before the dessert. The taste is really good. They are all made by the chef based on the fresh ingredients of the day. The service girl is very helpful, humorous and polite. Highly recommended! The downside is that the seats are too close, and you can hear the conversations at the table next to you.

This is a pretty good Nordic restaurant, mainly serving creative Nordic seafood. The taste is pretty good and the food is very delicate. The only drawback is that the quantity is too small. Two people ordered about eight dishes, but they were not full. It cost nearly 500 RMB, which is not cost-effective.